Michael Groden
"James Joyce's Ulysses in Hypermedia": Problems of Annotation

The Passage Later in Ulysses

Some clear and certain statements - factual and with an unproblematical relationship to the passage - can be said about Bloom's two remarks, "I was just going to throw it away" and "I was going to throw it away that moment." There really was a horse race, the Gold Cup, at Ascot in England on June 16, 1904. Lyons mentions this when he asks to see Bloom's newspaper, and Bloom recognizes this, even though he seems to have no idea which horses are entered in the race. There really was a horse named Throwaway in the race, a horse that ran as a 20-to-1 outsider. Throwaway went on to win the race. All this becomes clear later in Ulysses. A group of Dubliners - all of whom bet on Sceptre (even Lyons, who temporarily followed up on what he thought was Bloom's tip but who was later dissuaded from the bet) - talk in a pub, and one of the men reports Bloom's conversation with Lyons. As a result, the men believe that Bloom, in what they see as typical of Jews, had an inside tip on Throwaway, won a pile of money on the race, and didn't share his winnings with the other men by buying them a round of drinks. Bloom is almost injured in an attack as a result. He eventually reads a newspaper account of the race, but it is not clear even then if he connects the results of the race with his remark earlier in the day to Lyons.

An annotation can point out all of these details. But how much should it say? Should beginning readers, in a note to a passage at this early point in Ulysses, be told information that they will only learn later on in the book?


Screens in This Section
A Sample Passage
Annotations to the Passage
The Passage Later in Ulysses
Rhetoric and Tact in Annotations
Annotation in Print and On a Screen

Sections
Title Screen
Introduction
The Hypermedia Project
A Passage from Ulysses
Questions Regarding Annotations
Eight Possible Presentations
Works Cited