Science, Technology, and War
themes:
- does war speed up the progress of technology?
- the military is a big source of new technology (but only in
certain areas)
- history of government support for scientific research and
new technology
- from early on gov't supported some practical science, eg.
mapmaking
- late 19th c. government funded agricultural research
- government-funded research for war started in WWI
- WWII even more funding for research
- this time the funding continued after the war
- government started funding basic science
- in recent years industry funding has become more important
than government funding
- what is the government good at doing and what is private
industry good at doing?
- the military-industrial-academic complex
- how does war shape the development of technology
The Civil War was significantly impacted by
technology, particularly railroads and more accurate guns.
Maxim's invention of the first machine gun grew out of civil war
experiments. Yet when World War I came the U.S. found itself
behind in military technology.
World War I started in 1914, US entered April 1917,
Armistice Dec. 1918.
- The war quickly settled down to a trench
warfare (photo)
stalemate due to the use of machine
guns and barbed wire--technology seemed to be the only way out.
- as well as airplanes and poison gas, tanks and
submarines were developed into useful weapons
- The war therefore led to the first major wartime
efforts to develop technology for military use
French tank
Poison gas
- A few months after the war began the French
apparently used gas against the Germans and the Germans
retaliated in kind.
- In the 9th month of the war the Germans released
a cloud of chlorine gas--which causes choking--on French troops who
retreated in panic, leaving behind perhaps 5,000 dead. A four
mile gap in the line was opened, but the Germans had not brought
forward enough reserves to exploit it and the Allies repaired the break.
- At first troops wore makeshift masks of
handkerchiefs wetted with urine and tied over nose and mouth.
- Germany was widely criticized for breaking the Hague
Conventions of 1899.
- In mid-1915 Germans started using phosgene, which
causes severe lung damage, and both sides developed gas masks.
- By the end of 1916 a variety of weapons were in
use by both sides. Germans introduced mustard gas--could cause
burns to exposed skin even when a soldier was protected by a mask.
- This quickly became a research race. It
started with the US
Bureau of Mines working on adapting mining equipment.
- A central lab was created in fall 1917 at
American University--at peak employed 1200 scientists. Developed
a new gas--Lewisite, that poisoned through the skin, simpler ways of
producing mustard gas, and more
- Chemical Warfare Service created July
1918--university chemists and Bureau of Mines personnel were given
commissions.
- In all as many as 50 different gases were
used--poison-gas causalities 1.3 million with 92,000 deaths.
- After the war chemists were proud of their
contribution to the nation--wanted ongoing research. Argued that
chemical weapons were humane (and effective) because they disabled
soldiers rather than killing them. They didn't get the continuing
high level of research they wanted.
- A strong reaction against the use of gas took
over instead. The Geneva Protocol--an international protocol
signed in 1925 prohibiting the use in war of "asphyxiating, poisonous
and other gasses" and of "bacteriological methods of warfare."
- The treaty held through World War II but use of poison gas
is a difficult issue today. Fear becomes an issue even when it is
not used: seven
Israelis suffocated to death due to improper use of gas masks during
Iraqi attacks in the Gulf War.
German signal corps
soldiers placing their carrier pigeons in a shelter during a gas attack
The Navy also decided it needed
to encourage research
- Thomas
Edison said he had a plan for preparedness but that he was
reluctant to discuss the terrible devices he had in mind. War
could be mechanized with labor-saving devices
- In 1915 the Navy established the Naval Consulting
Board
- the board was to consist of "Civilian Experts on
Machines" who would originate ideas and critically examine ideas
submitted by others--11 professional societies each named two
members. These were engineers and business leaders, not scientists
- the Board had a big fight about building its own
laboratory, but the laboratory that was eventually built continued
after the war as the Naval Research
Laboratory
- the effort that got the most public attention was
a plan to screen inventions submitted by the public--Edison believed
that American inventors could win the war
- 110,000 inventions were submitted, 110 deemed
worthy of development, only one reached production--an aircraft
simulator invented by W. Guy Ruggles
- one of the Board's largest projects was trying to
find new methods of submarine detection
- they also sponsored research on gyroscopic
stabilization, leading to the first primitive autopilots for aircraft (Lawrence Sperry
proved they didn't work too well--at least not well enough for the
pilot to get romantic instead of flying the plane)
World War I British Submarine
Meanwhile scientists felt unappreciated and the
National Academy of Sciences (an honorary society created during the
Civil War) established the National Research Council in 1916 to show
what science could contribute
- Scientists wanted to show how valuable science
is: George Ellery Hale (an astronomer) wrote: "I really believe this is
the greatest chance we have ever had to advance research in America"
- they also focused on the problem of submarine
detection--German U-Boats sunk over a million tons of Allied and
neutral merchantment in the first quarter of 1917
- the NRC brought in professors from universities
to work on the problem
- a young mathematician named Max
Mason had the idea of a listening device
that could focus sound--he build something that looked like a trombone
- the final device had a range of 3 miles and was
very successful. Similar technology was developed for artillery
ranging
- scientists felt they had proved the scientific
research approach to developing new technology
So then what was the impact of war on technology and science?
Consider aviation as another example. The Wright brothers had a terrible time interesting anyone
in their success--the U.S. military did not purchase its first plane
until 1909
- Europeans were more interested, and during World War I
learned to use aircraft for reconnaissance,
bombing,
and fighting
- when the U.S.
entered World War I in 1917, we lagged far behind in military
aircraft
- European countries had done much more, and in
1915 the U.S. realized it was behind and created an organization called
the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics to jump-start the
production of military aircraft.
- forced a patent pool--Manufacturers Aircraft
Association--to allow the best technologies to be used
- the Curtis Company designed a training plane, the
JN-4, but battle planes were built on a British design
- In the year before the U.S. declared war the U.S. aviation
industry produced 411 planes, though a large number of airplane
engines were shipped to Europe by one company partnership that had
designed a good lightweight engine and techniques for mass-producing it
(the Liberty Engine, Packard and Hall-Scott).
- all of the countries involved struggled to figure
out how to make effective use of aircraft--new strategies had to be
developed by pilots
and integrated by generals
- mass production of aircraft was well underway in
the U.S. when the war ended--2091 planes had been shipped to France and
1041 were awaiting shipment
- by the end of the war in 1919 the army
had 5,500
planes, though most of the fighters were purchased in Europe.
French
Spad WWI fighter--National Air and Space Museum
there was a need for research also, or at least
coordination, and it almost instantly outgrew the resources of amateurs
like the Wright brothers or even the small firms that were building
aircraft.
- The National
Advisory Committee on Aeronautics was one of a number of
organizations created as a result of lobbying by scientists and
engineers for a new government role in research and development in
World War I.
- President Wilson signed the naval appropriations
bill that created the National Advisory Committee on Aeronautics in
March 1915. The scientists, engineers and enthusiasts who had
lobbied for the bill for more than four years wanted government funding
of aeronautical research to allow the United States to catch up with
rapid developments in Europe. But the legislation did not pass
until the outbreak of war provided an additional push, and the bill did
nothing more than create an advisory committee and provide it with a
small appropriation.
- The NACA then set out to invent its own
role. In its first few years the new Committee played a
significant role in the wartime coordination of industry and used some
of its small budget to sponsor research at private institutions, but
its leaders made the building of a new laboratory their highest
priority. The laboratory at Langley Field,
in Virginia, established the NACA as a federal research agency despite
its title as an advisory committee. After the war ended, debates
over the role of the federal government in supporting and regulating
aviation created considerable uncertainly about the future of the NACA,
but the final result strengthened the Committee's emphasis on research
because other aviation-related functions--regulation and the
sponsorship of infrastructure--were assigned to the Department of
Commerce. The federal government also helped the aviation
industry by funding air
mail service.
- At the Langley
Memorial Laboratory, dedicated in June 1920, NACA scientists and
engineers set out to invent a role for the federal government in
peacetime aviation research. The laboratory provided fairly
up-to-date facilities: a wind
tunnel, an engine-dynamometer laboratory, and a general research
laboratory building.
- The laboratory developed a focus on aeronautical
principles both in order to take advantage of its wind tunnel
facilities and to avoid competition with the military services (which
wanted to maintain control of testing and setting specifications for
new aircraft designs for miliary missions) and the National Bureau of
Standards and industry (which had facilities for engine research).
- The NACA found a niche not only in its choice of
research program but also in how it approached research problems: "The
strength of the NACA seems to be that it had the luxury of pursuing
incrementally over a long period of time answers to problems that were
of great interest to the commercial and military worlds."
- The leaders of the NACA initially thought that
the committee had to establish its reputation by scientific (not
engineering) achievement, and hired Max Munk from
Germany because of his theoretical reputation. Munk made a key
discovery, that by compressing the air in a tunnel you could use scale
models in wind tunnels to provide results that would correlate with
data from a full-sized plane in actual use. This idea was put
into use in a 5 foot diameter variable density tunnel in 1923, and then
was followed by a 20 foot diameter tunnel for full scale research in
1927.
NACA's
first wind tunnel
- the NACA used the large tunnel for research on
propellers, landing gear, and drag. They discovered that the
engine provide as much as 1/3 of the plane's total drag, and invented
a way to cover the engine to enhance cooling while reducing
drag. During
a test a plane that normally averaged 157 mph averaged 177
mph. But this wasn't a theoretical breakthrough--each cowling was
custom developed for a particular combination of airplane and engine by
wind tunnel experiments.
detail from Diego Rivera mural at Detroit Institute of Art
- The necessity of practical results to justify
federal funding and the dominant role of engineers on the NACA main
committee gradually reversed that attitude, establishing the
relationship between theoretical and practical research as a central
tension within the laboratory and the agency as a whole.
At the end of World War I, the airplane had proved itself as a
weapon but military aircraft weren't of much pratical use
- because there were more surplus airplanes than demand,
production of new airplanes almost ceased until the government rescued
the industry by creating an air mail service
- Aeronautical Engineering began to develop as a
field of study: in 1929 1400 students were studying aeroengineering in
more than a dozen schools.
- Meanwhile, aircraft design was developing in the
1920s and 1930s as the market finally began to expand again.
- Ford
trimotor of 1926--metal structure and cantilevered wing.
Ford
Trimotor, National Air and Space Museum
- People began to predict that soon there would be an
airplane in every garage
- Aluminum propeller developed in 1925, and
variable pitch propellers by the end of the decade.
- The first successful helicopter
flew in Germany in 1936; Russian emigree Igor Sikorsky
had a U.S. design in tests by 1939 and got a contract from the army in
1940
Sikorsky's
first helicopter
The airplane became a symbol of how much the world had changed
World War II started in 1939, the US entered in the
fall of 1941
- it grew out of the desperate economic situation
and finally provided an end to the depression
- scientists and engineers were eager to put their
skill to work and the military moved more quickly this time, organizing
a National
Defense Research Committee in 1940
- the NDRC concentrated on placing contracts at
universities, not building new research centers
- In May 1941 NDRC changed its name to the Office
of Scientific Research and Development
- sponsored many important wartime research projects
radar set on
airplane
Radar
- radar research had begun in the 1930s after some
scientifists had observed reflections of radio waves from objects
- by
1937 the British had a continuous chain of stations
but these used long waves and required two large antennas
- N. L. Oliphant invented the resonant cavity
magnetron, first tube capable of sufficient power for radar at
wavelengths less than 50 cm (therefore allowing much smaller antennas
and also more accurate results)
- this new idea was brought to the US in 1940 and a
major research effort started to develop microwave radar
- the Radiation Lab
at MIT designed 150 different radar systems--three generations of
systems went into use before the war ended
- invented a junction box to transmit and receive
from the same antenna
- invented Loran--a way to determine your location
by triangulating from special radio signals
- developed the Microwave Early Warning system with
a range of 200 miles
- the Radio Lab at Harvard worked on radar
countermeasures--jamming, straw
antiaircraft
fire
The Proximity
Fuse
- in 1940 anti-aircraft fire using timed fused
brought down one plane per 2500 rounds fired
- you need the shell to explode even without a
direct hit
- many possible technological
approaches for detecting when the shell is close to the
airplane--radar, sonar, passive acoustic, photelectric...
- very hard to detect anything from a shell not
just moving rapidly through the air but also spinning at 475 RPS.
During development it was jokingly called "the world's most complicated
form of self-detroying ammunition"
- radar seemed like the best bet, but how to make a
device with vacuum tubes that would fit in a space the size of an icecream
cone and survive a force of 20,000 g when fired?
- at one point scientists were dropping tubes from
the roof of a 3 story building onto a concrete driveway to test their
impact resistance
- development went amazingly fast: pilot production
started in Nov. 1941, simulated combat tests in Aug. 1942, in use by
Jan. 1943
- mass production of 2 million fuses reduced the
cost to $16-23
- results: 6 times more effective than timed fuses
The Atomic Bomb:
German scientists many of the key discoveries in
nuclear physics that made nuclear weapons possible, leading to fear in
the U.S. that the Germans would build an atomic bomb.
- some elements are unstable and will naturally change to
something else and release radioactivity
- Henri
Becquerel discovered radioactivity as a property of uranium in
1896, Marie Curie
discovered other radioactive elements, but they didn't know what was
happening
Lise Meitner
- Otto
Hahn , Lise
Meitner, and O.R. Frisch
worked in the 1930s to understand the results of bombarding uranium
with neutrons--realized that the uranium fissioned.
- by 1939 it was obvious and widely know that a
chain reaction might be possible because each atom that fissioned
released neutrons that could hit other atoms and cause them to fission
- Refugee scientists in the U.S. feared a German
bomb. Leo Szilard composed
two letters for Einstein to sign warning President Roosevelt of the
dangers of a German atomic bomb, one in August 1939 and the other
in April 1940. Fear was widespread enough that U.S. and British
journals volunarily censored related scientific papers.
- Germans were indeed working on a bomb, but got
stuck in a dead end. Supporters of Werner
Heisenberg say he did this on purpose.
Difficulties setting up such a big, uncertain research
and development project: the Manhattan Project
- First organized under National Defense Research
Committee (approval for project Oct. 1941) then turned over to the army
in June 1942. The army put General Leslie Groves in
charge.
- The first thing to do was prove a chain reaction
was possible. That effort was led by Enrico
Fermi , first at Columbia then at the University of Chicago.
The first
successful chain
reaction took place Dec. 2, 1942 in a small reactor built in a
squash court at the Univ. of Chicago.
- Providing fuel for the bomb was a tremendous
technical challenge--must separate uranium-235, which is less than 1%
of the uranium mined and differs in weight by only .13%. Two
methods of separation: a cyclotron and gaseous diffusion of uranium
hexaflouride (the only gaseous compound, but one that is both poisonous
and corrosive) were set up at Oak Ridge , Tenn.,
using TVA power. The other alternative is to make plutonium
by chain reactions--reactors to do this were built in Hanford,
Washington.
K-25
gaseous diffusion plant at Oak Ridge
- Robert
Oppenheimer led the effort to design the bomb and said he needed to
bring scientists together at a single laboratory. Los Alamos
opened in March 1943. Developed two bomb designs, one using
uranium and one using plutonium. The plutonium design was tested
in the Trinity
test near Alamogordo NM on July 16, 1945. Exploded with the force
of 20,000 tons of TNT.
Bombs
used in Japan
The decision to drop the bomb (
good links on the decision
)
- Germany was clearly defeated and the Japanese
were retreating--was it necessary to use the bomb?
- Could there have been a demonstration and warning
instead? Would it have been used in Europe or was racism a factor?
- After spending $2 billion would the goverment
have been accused of wasting money if it wasn't used?
- when Roosevelt died on April 12, 1945, the bomb
project was so secret that Vice President Harry Truman didn't even know
about it. The bomb was used because having built it everyone
assumed that having built it they would use it.
- three B-29 bombers set out for Hiroshima , Japan on
Aug. 6, 1945. The Japanese sounded the all-clear when they saw
only 3 planes. The Enola Gay dropped the 5 ton bomb and it
exploded with the force of 15,000 tons of TNT. 130,000 people
died within 3 months, 68% of the buildings of the city were destroyed.
- A plutonium bomb was dropped on Nagasaki
on Aug. 9, 1945. Exploded with the force of 22,000 tons of TNT.
bomb
damage in Hiroshima
Does it fit the theory of just war?
The scientists tried to prevent an arms race from developing. Why
did they feel so strongly, and did they have any hope of success?
People were frightened by
the bomb and began to question the idea
that technological progress was always good
- the cold war meant real fears that a nuclear war would start
- Hiroshima made vivid the dangers of radioactivity, leading
to movies about mutant monsters (Godzilla,
1954)
- young people in the 1960s began to reject the boring lives
their parents had wanted after WWII
- Rachel Carson published Silent Spring in 1960, and public
concern about environmental issues grew rapidly
- the Civil Rights Movement was showing the American people
that you can change the wrongs of society
- Sputnik (the first artificial satellite) and computers
started a new technological age
- The space program turned out in some ways to be a dead end,
while the computer has taken us in very different directions
World War II changed the relationship between science and
government
Scientists involved in the war wanted several things after
the war: Continued military funding, a civilian
Atomic Energy
agency, and civilian funding source for basic scientific research
Lessons Learned from WWII:
- Basic science=power
- we can develop new technologies quickly to do
whatever we want
- technology gives us dangerous power
- some policy issues require technical knowledge in
order to understand the issue
Vannevar Bush
- wrote a prediction
of the future in 1945--quite accurate except he missed completely
the digital computer (much of his engineering research had been on
analog computers)
- wrote a report later published as a book called: Science: The
Endless Frontier
- his belief that the federal government should pay for basic
scientific research led to the National Science Foundation
- he was critical of the manned space program on the grounds
that it was too dangerous
- he understood that managing information was becoming a key
problem
Military support
for science
- Department of Defense was convinced that research
was essential; leftover wartime money poured into basic research,
eg.
at the new Office of Naval Research
- Office of Naval
Research in 1948 supported 700
projects in 150 universities and nonprofit labs involving 2000
scientists at a cost of about $20 million a year
- this was basic research, not specific military
projects. The Navy actually worried about whether universities
would accept military funding, but these grants were unclassified and
had no controls on publication. Scientists had few qualms
- other military services started similar programs
Impact of military funding
- Some fields of science got a lot more funding
than others (eg. chemistry suffered relative to physics
- universities became big businesses
- “big science”: big projects run by teams of
scientists instead of individual scientists designing their own work
Federal Funding for Basic
Scientific Research
Millions of Dollars (not adjusted for Inflation)
| year |
Dept. Defense |
AEC/DOE |
NSF |
total |
| 1952 |
31 |
34 |
1 |
121 |
| 1955 |
20 |
42 |
10 |
130 |
| 1960 |
168 |
104 |
68 |
590 |
| 1965 |
263 |
258 |
171 |
1,435 |
| 1970 |
317 |
287 |
245 |
1,926 |
| 1975 |
300 |
313 |
486 |
2,588 |
| 1980 |
540 |
523 |
815 |
4,674 |
| 1985 |
861 |
943 |
1,262 |
7,819 |
| 1990 |
948 |
1,505 |
1,586 |
11,286 |
| 1995 |
1,264 |
1,634 |
1,973 |
13,895 |
The totals are so much larger than
the amounts for specific agencies because there is considerable basic
research done by the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare and
because NASA expenditures are counted mostly as basic research.
(source:
Table A)
National
Science Foundation
- Scientists wanted the continuation of federal
research funding, from a civilian agency. Vannevar Bush wrote a
report calling for this called: Science:
The Endless Frontier
- Senato Harry M. Kilgore (D. West Virginia)
proposed a bill in 1944 emphasizing R&D for small business.
Patents were to be owned by the federal government
- Senator Magnuson proposed a bill along the lines
the scientists wanted--scientists would decide how to spend the money
- mid 1946 compromise leaning towards Kilgore
failed to pass, 1947 compromise leaning towards Magnuson passed but was
vetoed by Truman on grounds of lack of accountability
- compromise finally passed in 1950, but only got
$225,000 total the first year
Federal Funding for Research and Development
Millions of Dollars (not
adjusted for inflation)
(source:
Table B)
| year |
Dept. of Ag. |
Dept Defense |
AEC/DOE |
NASA |
NSF |
Total |
| 1951 |
55 |
1,123 |
158 |
45 |
.15 |
1,522 |
| 1955 |
72 |
1,529 |
253 |
43 |
10 |
2,045 |
| 1960 |
126 |
5,712 |
762 |
369 |
75 |
7,552 |
| 1965 |
225 |
6,797 |
1,241 |
4,952 |
187 |
14,614 |
| 1970 |
281 |
7,360 |
1,346 |
3,800 |
289 |
15,339 |
| 1975 |
420 |
9,012 |
2,047 |
3,064 |
595 |
19,039 |
| 1980 |
688 |
13,981 |
4,753 |
3,234 |
882 |
29,830 |
| 1985 |
943 |
26,792 |
4,966 |
3,327 |
1,346 |
48,360 |
| 1990 |
1,108 |
37,268 |
5,631 |
6,533 |
1,689 |
63,559 |
| 1995 |
1,380 |
34,362 |
6,145 |
9,015 |
2,149 |
68,755 |
The Cold War was the primary
justification for all this military spending on science and technology:
Origins:
- The U.S. was already afraid of communism before
World War II, but the Soviet Union was our ally against Germany
- Once it was clear that Germany was falling, both
countries rushed to occupy as much territory as possible. One the
reasons the U.S. used the Atom Bomb was to end the war faster so the
Soviets would not take as much territory in Asia
- The Soviet Union wanted some control in what it
saw as buffer states, and tended to move towards making them puppets.
- The U.S. saw this as the Soviets moving to
gradually expand
towards world dominion and developed a policy of containment.
The Truman
Doctrine (1947)--the U.S. would help the people of free countries
fighting communist takeover (either from without or within)
- mindset--everyone has to choose sides
- The U.S. supplied
Berlin by air (which no one was sure would be possible) when the
Soviets blockaded it in 1948 to try to take complete control.
planes lined
up for Berlin airlift
Height:
- Domino theory--fear of other countries falling to
communism
- The Red Scare of the 1950s (Joseph
McCarthy)--anyone who had had communist or disloyal ideas
was a threat to the nation and should loose their job
- Korean War
(1950-53)
- Cuban
Missile Crisis , October 18-29,
1962. The Soviet Union was installing nuclear missiles in
Cuba. Kennedy responded by blockading Cuba. The Soviet
leader, Nikita S. Khrushchev, authorized the firing of nuclear weapons
against the U.S. if the U.S. invaded Cuba. After several days the
Soviets agreed to remove the missiles.
- The Department of Defense got lots of money to
develop new technology because it was seen as a wartime necessity
The Nuclear Arms
Race
- The Soviets did not start full-scale research on
an atomic bomb until after Hiroshima, but once Stalin realized its
importance and started pushing they caught up fast.
- first Soviet atomic bomb tested Aug. 1949
(espionage helped them at most by 3 years). Stalin wasn’t
satisfied he was secure still and the U.S. felt a lot more insecure
- The first Soviet atomic bomb had used the same
design as some early U.S. bombs. But the first Soviet hydrogen bomb was
an original design, different and perhaps even ahead of that of the
United States. On August 12, 1953, the Soviet Union exploded its first
thermonuclear bomb at the Semipalatinsk test site in Kazakhstan.
Missiles and Satellites
- U.S. cold war strategy was based on bombers
carrying nuclear weapons--for one thing, it was cheap, and Truman and
Eisenhower both were reluctant to increase the size of the government
and distort the economy by large-scale defense spending.
Substituting technological superiority for a large standing army put a
new weight on being ahead
- after initial slow development, intercontinental
ballistic missiles came to be seen as the next key technology
- First successful test of Atlas was Dec. 1957,
first unit activated April 1958 but real operational capability
probably not until 1959. Initially had to be erected and fueled
(and LOX) before launch.
- Soviet R-7/SS-6 Sapwood ICBM tested Jan.
30, 1958, limited operational capability in early 1960.
Titan
ICBM
If it was possible for human beings to fly, then why
not fly to the moon? (a
brief history of rockets)
- Jules Verne's novel From the Earth to the Moon
(1865), featuring a launch from a cannon in northeastern Florida
- Konstantin Tsiolkovsky's work (influenced by
Verne) in Russia on the theory of rocket propulsion?
- in 1903 he published a book titled Exploring
Cosmic Space with Reactive Devices in which he laid out the
mathematics of orbital mechanics and designed a rocket powered by
liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen.
- Recognized many of the
problems, eg. burning up during reentry, and thought of multistage
rockets (which he called rocket trains).
- No attempt to
experiment--he received only one small grant.
- Saw spaceflight as
liberation from human limits and the first step towards the perfection
of human society.
- Robert Goddard's theories (1919 treatise A
Method of Reaching Extremely High Altitudes), and experiments,
starting in 1926, with small, liquid-fuel rockets
- In 1930 Goddard set up full time resarch in
New Mexico, attempting 41 launches, 31 of them successful, in the next
11 years. His largest rocket was 22 feet in length, fuilded with
gasoline and liquid oxygen. After 1941 he couldn't get further
support, and he died in 1945.
- He was much laughed at and couldn't take it,
so he conducted his research privately, failed to build an
organization, suffered from lack of support, and had little
influence. He repeatedly failed to get military funding (on the
grounds that the U.S. had no need for military rockets at that time),
and while he received over $200,000 from foundations, it was on a year
by year basis that made it difficult to undertake large projects.
His fame came only when space travel began to look realistic--in 1960
the U.S. government awarded his family $1 million for the rights to use
more than 200 of his patents.
The key to turning this enthusiasm into a serious space
program turned out to be government support, and the Germans were the
first to get it.
- the roots of this development are in an society
of amateur rocketers inspired by a German-speaking Rumanian
schoolteacher and rocket theoretician, Hermann Oberth, who published
The Rocket into Planetary Space in 1923
- The Society for Space Travel (VfR) was founded in
1927, with Oberth as its president
Society for Space Travel
- by 1929 it had 870 members, including Wernher von
Braun, who had just graduated from high school.
- It had two goals: popularize the idea of flight
to the moon and planets and perform serious experiments in rocket
propulsion.
- Oberth was a classic incompetent theoretician
(one of his colleagues said that if "Oberth wants to drill a hole,
first he invents the drill press"), early efforts resulted in many
explosions inclusing one that killed a member, Despite these problems,
the society successfully launched 87 small liquid-fueled rockets in
1931 from an abandoned WWI ammunition storage facility (including one
that set fire to a nearby police station). Experiments continued
at a slowing rate until 1934, when the society went bankrupt
- Amateur research could only afford to go so
far--the VfR was funding only by dues and admission charged to view
launches. The leaders of the VfR promoted the idea of rockets as
weapons in hopes of getting the funding they needed.
- The German army became interested in rockets in
1929 as a way of getting around the treaty of Versailles limits on the
army
- In 1932 the German army assigned Walter
Dornberger to look into liquid-fueled rockets, and he hired von Braun
and a number of amateurs--but clearly to develop a weapon, not space
travel
- This led to the building of the V-2
intermediate range ballistic missile, used against England.
- When the war was over von Braun arranged to to
captured by the U.S. not the Soviet Union and said he wasn't a Nazi, he
was only interested in space travel.
captured
V-2 being prepared for launch
U.S. military interest was at first spotty.
- U.S. cold war strategy was based on bombers
carrying nuclear weapons. For one thing, it was cheap, and Truman
and Eisenhower both were reluctant to increase the size of the
government and distort the economy by large-scale defense
spending. Substituting technological superiority for a large
standing army put a new weight on being ahead
- Project RAND
(an Air Force think tank) produced in May 1946 a report: "Preliminary
Design of an Experimental World-Circling Spaceship" mentioned
reconnaissance, weather, and communications
- In 1951 RAND scientists visiting Wright
Field heard a briefing by James Lipp of Boston University's Physical
Research Laboratory about using television for satellite
reconnaissance. The key RAND reconnaissance people though the
idea was ridiculous, and set out to disprove it with pictures taken at
30,000 feet with 8mm movie camera lenses mounted to a 35mm Leica camera
loaded with coarse grain film and processed for poor resolution.
The pictures showed streets and bridges, convincing Amrom Katz and
others that satellite reconnaissance was feasible.
- the army had von Braun working on medium range
ballistic missiles, the Air Force was working on the Atlas
intercontinental ballistic missile, and the Navy's Naval Research Lab
was doing a wide range of scientific research on rockets--but none of
these had high priority or crash project funding
- Korean war led to more funding for
intercontinental ballistic missiles in 1951--Atlas--but with funding
only for a slow development process (at Convair--even in FY 1954 Atlas
got only $14 million). Only in 1954 was the decision make to give
it high priority
Atlas
ICBM
Reconnaissance was a big need:
- What created stronger interest in the Department
of Defense was not only fears of intercontinental ballistic missiles
but the lure of spy satellites.
- Balloon reconnaissance over the Soviet Union
began in 1956--243 balloons were never heard from again and only 44
were successfully recovered (the Soviets put some on display in Moscow
and showed pictures of an air base in Turkey they said they had found
on the film carried by one of the balloons)
- The U-2 was
approved in 1954, designed by Kelly Johnson and the Lockheed Skunk
Works in 80 days, and first used in 1956. A Clemson alumnus
piloted one of the key flights.
U-2
- One of the key problems for an open state
competing with a closed one was information. You could do it with
aircraft--U-2, but only at substantial risk--a U-2 was shot down over
the Soviet Union in 1960, creating a major diplomatic
incident. This proved to be how rockets and particularly
launching satellites finally got substantial support
With all the rocket building, satellites were so
clearly in the works that they were made part of the plans for the
International Geophysical Year, a cooperative research effort in
1957-1958
- But this raised an interesting dilemma--it wasn't
a race for a spy satellite but an idea for something the Soviets didn't
need and wouldn't like
- Eisenhower insisted that the project be peaceful
rather than military. For one thing, this reflected his attempt
to avoid a military-dominated state.
- this may also have been a strategy to establish
the legitimacy of satellite overflight. Where do air rights
end?--how to establish open skies in international law
- one way to do it is to launch a scientific
satellite, preferably under international auspices (IGY). Far
better that this be launched by the Navy's rocket built for scientific
research than by what would clearly be a ballistic missile (then it
would just look like a military test)
- or, you can let the Soviet Union launch first and
not complain when their satellite goes over the U.S.--then they can
hardly complain when a U.S. satellites goes over them
- The Naval Research Lab's Vanguard
program was chosen for the first launch in a close vote by a panel of
experts (on the basis of a better satellite) to launch the first
satellite instead of von Braun's Redstone/Jupiter (which could have
reached orbit in a test flight in Sept. 1956 if it had had a live upper
stage). This was probably not a political decision, but it was on
the basis on science, not a race with the Russians
- What is clearly political is that the DoD and
Eisenhower went along with that choice, knowing that it almost surely
meant that the USSR would launch first
- And they did, launching Sputnik 1 on October 4,
1957
Sputnik
1
- This lead to a large public furor and the
creation of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Enough work had been done on a project called
Man-in-Space-Soonest by the founding of NASA (Oct. 1, 1958) so
that a consensus had been reached:
- goal: to orbit and recover a manned satellite at
the earliest practical date and to investigate the capabilities
of man in this environment
- configuration: a ballistic capsule with high
aerodynamic drag to be landed with parachutes
- the Atlas ICBM was the most reliable available
booster system (although not tested successfully until Nov.
1958), but expensive ($2.5 million each) and not yet available, so
testing was done with a cluster of solid rockets called little Joe and
with Redstone
- In Dec. 1958 Eisenhower decided to draw
astronaut candidates only from the pool of military test pilots (for
security reasons, for one thing). The education requirement was
reduced to bachelors degree or equivalent and test pilot school.
- Testing of astronaut candidates started in early
1959 from a pool of 110 qualified pilots. 32 were selected on the
basis of written and psychological tests for physical testing.
This testing followed a pattern set up for the Manhigh research balloon
program--very detailed medical testing to ensure good health and
establish a baseline and environmental tests. 18 of the 31
were recommended without medical reservations. They went into a
program of training and participation in system design
- the first unmanned test of the Mercury capsule
with the Atlas booster was held July 29, 1960. One minute
after lift-off telemetry showed a complete loss of pressure in fuel
tanks, then telemetry was lost. The booster was in the clouds at
the time, but apparently it either exploded or suffered catastrophic
structural failure.
- In Sept. 1960 an Atlas-Able carrying an early
moon probe also failed severely, raising questions about the use
of Atlas for Mercury which were particularly severe because of the
pressures of an election year.
- There was a lot of press criticism that Mercury
was not a crash program, but rather took things one step at a
time with attention to budget and took second priority to the ICBM
program.
- the first test of the Mercury-Redstone
combination to be used to launch a person into ballistic flight
was conducted on Nov. 21, 1960. The booster lifted 4 inches off
the launch pad and then settled back down. The escape tower
activated and took off, without the capsule, landing near the launch
site and the capsule, still sitting on the booster, shot out its
parachutes. Disarming the booster was not easy, but at least it
was available for study to determine the cause of failure (a plug which
disconnected unevenly, sending an abort signal).
Mercury-Redstone
1
- on Dec. 19, 1960 a successful test of
Mercury-Redstone was finally completed.
- the question of whether a human being could
survive in space became unnecessary on April 12, 1961, when the
Soviet Union launched Yuri Gagarin into orbit in a capsule weighing 3
times what Mercury weighed. No news of the flight was released
until after recovery.
- on May 5, 1961, Alan B. Shepard, Jr., rode a
Mercury-Redstone in a ballistic orbit into space on live TV
- safety of the Altas was such a concern that a
chimpanzee named Enos was launched on Mercury Atlas 5 on Nov. 28,
1961. The machine to test his abilities under stress--pulling
levers to receive a reward or avoid punishment--malfunctioned and he
received shocks even when correct. He performed, but arrived on
the ship hopping mad.
- after a series of delays John Glenn was finally
orbited on Feb. 20, 1962, Scott Carpenter on May 24, 1962, Walter
Schirra on Oct. 3, 1962, and Gordon Cooper on May 15, 1963
(observations of the earth).
Once you have put people in space, what do you do with
them?
- The Dec. 1960 PSAC Report had projected a manned
circumlunar flight about 1970, and a manned landing on the moon about
1975 at a total cost of $26 to 38 billion.
NASA included only circumlunar flight in its ten
year plan, yet as early as mid-1959 NASA had identified a manned trip
to the moon as a logical next step after putting people in space and
had started the necessary planning.
- Eisenhower refused to include money for Apollo
development in his 1962 budget, while at the same time he approved
development of an anti-satellite satellite
Meanwhile, Kennedy was elected in November 1960,
having made a big fuss in his campaign about the missile gap (which did
not in fact exist)
- the first signs from the Kennedy administration
were negative on space in general--NASA worried he would support the
Air Force which wanted NASA to be replace by a military space program
- Kennedy's vice president, Johnson, had long been
a major supporter of the space program
- Not until Jan 30 did Kennedy appoint a new NASA
administrator, James Webb, who took office Feb. 14. But Webb was
clearly an ambitious man
the key shift, however, came in Kennedy's political
situation
- April 12, 1961, Soviet Union launched Gagarin,
and the U.S. was again embarrassingly behind
- at an April 14 meeting it became clear that
Kennedy wanted to accept the Soviet challenge, but was worried by the
cost
on April 17 a group of anti-Castro Cuban exiles,
trained and financed by the U.S. invaded
Cuba in what came to be called the Bay of Pigs fiasco because it
was a total failure.
- on April 19 Kennedy asked Johnson to find a
"space program which promises dramatic results in which we could
win. Johnson and the Space Council organized hearings to answer
this question. concluded that there was no chance of beating the
Russians in putting a multi-manned laboratory in space
- NASA said we could beat the Russians to the moon,
and set 1967 as a target date. Accelerating the program would
raise the cost from $22.3 billion to $33.7 billion
- Meanwhile, on May 5, 1961, Alan B. Shepard, Jr.,
rode a Mercury-Redstone in a ballistic tragectory into space, with live
TV coverage. This was a reminder of what good press came from
putting people in space
- Webb and Secretary of Defense MacNamara, with
Johnson's blessing, wrote a memo entitled "Recommendations for our
National Space Program: Changes, Policies, Goals." Called for a
manned lunar landing before 1970, emphasizing national prestige and
international competition
- Kennedy approved this as it stood--proposed a 61%
increase in 1962 NASA budget
- On May 25, in a speech
(listen
to it all) entitled "Urgent National Needs"
Kennedy said: "I believe that this Nation should commit itself to
achieving the goal,before this decade is out, of landing a man on the
moon and returning him safely to earth."
- the key point is that Apollo was a crash
program--faster than even NASA had planned. The essential
definition of a crash program is that different approaches are worked
on in parallel
What
caused the end of the cold war?
- bankrupcy of the Soviet Union
- due to arms race, corruption, problems with
their system
- some people argue that Reagan's commitment to
Strategic Defense Initiative (defense against ICBMs) was the specific
increase in the arms race that the Soviets couldn't afford
- thaw in relationship between U.S. and Soviets
in later 1980s, new willingness to negotiate on both sides, the U.S.
didn't take advantage of Soviet weakness
Transformation of Soviet Union
- Gorbachev's Coming to Power (1985)--a new
generation
- Economic Reform Plan: Perestroika
(Restructuring)
- make the system work better by giving more
incentives
- not traditional incentives but market-based
incentives--small step towards a free market
- Political Reform Plan: Glasnost (Openness) eg.
less censorship of newspapers, arts
- Foreign Policy: From Detente (willingness
to make treaties with your enemy to make things stable) to
Disengagement (step out of the race)
The Cold War ends:
- Poland: Elections of 1989--Poles had an election
and chose leaders who weren't Soviet puppets, the Soviets did not
intervene
- Fall of Berlin
Wall (Nov. 9, 1989)--see also a
personal account
- came from ordinary people who refused to live
by the old rules
- Reunification of Germany (1990)
- Disintegration of Soviet Union (1991)
- Secession of Baltic States [Lithuania, Latvia,
Estonia]
- Collapse of U.S.S.R. & Boris Yelsin's Rise
to Power--moving substantially away from communism
Impact of the End of the Cold War on the U.S.
Department of Defense
- end of the arms race--no one to compete with any
more
- new mission--small wars, police actions (when do
you have the right to interfere in another country?)
- need different kinds of weapons, spending money
different places
- budget cuts, major cuts in some programs