|
Note: for the most recent information, please visit the Downloads
page.
HYDROMECHANICAL (HM) WELL TESTS
Conventional hydraulic well tests involve stressing a well and
interpreting the resulting changes in pressure in the vicinity. Thepressure
changes cause small displacements in the porous or fractured medium, and
this provides a potentially useful signal that can be interpreted along
with the pressure transients. We have been developing methods for conducting
and analyzing hydromechanical well tests in an effort to improve understanding
of fractured rock.

THEORETICAL ANALYSIS
Fractures either dilate or contract in response to head changes
during hydraulic well tests. Dropping the hydraulic head will increase
effective stress, compressing asperities on fracture surfaces and causing
aperture to diminish. Increasing hydraulic heads during an injection test,
or during the recovery following pumping, will relieve the effective stress
on asperities and dilate fracture aperture. Significant increases in head
during injection into a well may cause the fracture walls to separate
completely and no longer be supported by asperities. Continued injection
may elevate the stress intensity enough to cause propagation and the creation
of new fracture surface by hydraulic fracturing. Field data are interpreted
using a model that couples fluid flow and deformation of a flat-lying,
circular fracture.

FIELD TESTS
A distinctive characteristic of hydromechanical well tests is
the hysteretic relationship between displacement and well bore pressure.
This is shown below in the data from a constant rate pumping test (lower
left) and from a slug test (upper right). Interestingly, the loop-like
shape of these data appears in nearly all the field tests we have conducted
thus far, and in the theoretical analyses. The shape of the loop differs
between these tests, however, and the plots create a unique fingerprint
sensitive to formation properties.
REMOVABLE BOREHOLE EXTENSOMETER
The field technique requires a borehole extensometer for measuring
the small axial displacements accompanying HM well tests. We built our
first working prototype in 2002, and new designs were developed in 2003
and 2004 that have been tested to submicron repeatability.

|