The Clemson you attended
is not the same today, whether you’ve been out three
years or 30. And you wouldn’t want it to be. Like all
outstanding universities, your alma mater is continually improving.
As it prepares to grow in scope and reach, it also must prepare
to keep up physically. That’s where the Campus
Master Plan comes in.
If you’ve watched Clemson in the past decade, you’ve seen a variety
of construction, while at the same time a continuity of style, a blending of
past with present — in other words, growth by design.
So what is Clemson’s design for the next decade or two? Will Clemson
need more housing for students? What about classrooms? What about research?
What’s going on with all the road construction? And where in the heck
will people park?
Answers to these questions and many more have gone into determining Clemson’s
new Campus Master Plan. Our previous master plan was developed in 1994, and
many of the projects identified then have been completed. In 2000, the University
initiated a new comprehensive planning effort to address present needs and
to focus on Clemson’s vision of becoming a top-20 public university.
The completed plan will guide the University’s physical development over
the next 18 years and challenge Clemson to add 1.5 million square feet, double
its current annual investment in facilities, and adopt design guidelines that
will create a more sustainable, environmentally responsible and humane campus.
Its creation has involved input from all academic and administrative departments
as well as students, faculty and staff. It includes an analysis of the central
campus and surroundings as they now exist, an analysis of the University’s
needs to achieve its academic goals and an assessment of individual buildings.
Guiding
philosophy
Clemson’s plan is developed within a guiding philosophy
that respects the University’s unique campus and sense of community.
It should promote social/intellectual interaction among students, faculty,
staff and visitors. The Hendrix Center is a prime example.
It must respect the history, tradition and culture of campus. The recent renovation
of Hardin Hall (pictured right) combined the latest teaching technology
with historical preservation of the landmark.
It must also value sustainable design and account for growth. Renovation of
the Fraternity Quad, currently in design, is an example. It will be certified
as a leadership in energy and environmental design (LEED) project, the new
standard in green building design.
The plan assumes no change in overall enrollment, but does assume continued
steady growth in research and a considerable increase in private fund-raising
and legislative efforts related to facilities. Clemson’s new Public Service
Activities biosystems research center, which offers office and laboratory space
to prospective researchers, is an example.
Highlights
The University’s Campus
Master Plan is more than 80 pages long with a wealth of
drawings, explanations and other information.
Here are some highlights.
The plan allows for substantial increase in
research space to close the sizable space gap between Clemson
and the average top-20 research university.
Clemson has approximately 5 million square feet of nonresidential usable
space for academics and associated activities. Among the institutions in
the top 20 that we compare ourselves to, the University has roughly two-thirds
the average amount of space.
The campus plan includes an advanced materials
building south of Earle Hall and the Fluor Daniel Building.
It will be the first of several that will define a new academic
quad in the area.
The plan presents a vision for the former Johnstone site. It includes a new
dining hall, enhanced student programming facilities, housing, an academic
building and open green spaces that link with Cox Plaza and Bowman Field.
Master planners envision an academic village in the Douthit Hills area along
the Highway 93 entrance to campus that will replace existing duplexes with
a corridor of academic and research facilities and graduate student housing.
The plan calls for a structure that will be a “one-stop shop” for
student services, such as admissions, registration and financial aid, to
be located near the Clemson House across from the President’s Park.
A “Center of Centers” behind Cooper Library will take advantage
of a large underused open space. Placing centers and institutes together
with a spectrum of activities — offices, research modules, seminar
and classrooms — will create interaction and strengthen individual
units. The Center of Centers is envisioned as the permanent home for the
Academic Support Center and similar programs.
The plan calls for restructuring of the University’s Ravenel site,
located across the lake and near the YMCA. It includes expansion of office
and research space and other space for projects unsuitable for a campus location.
Storage and warehouse facilities and other support facilities currently located
in the center of campus and facilities that could be used for short-term,
project-specific research will be located here.
A major goal throughout development of the Campus Master Plan has been to
advance the concept of Clemson as a pedestrian campus. Although lack of parking
is a common complaint at any university, Clemson’s rate of spaces per
student — 83 places per 100 students — is significantly higher
than its peers. For example the University of Georgia has 55 spaces per 100
students, while Virginia has 66, Tennessee has 45 and UNC-Chapel Hill has
52.
The campus plan, however, has a parking plan that includes the addition of
parking decks as well as a more pedestrian-oriented central campus. Possible
deck sites include areas near Douthit Hills, the Hendrix Student Center,
the future academic quad area, the Brooks Center and Memorial Stadium.
You can find the full University Campus Master Plan with drawings, findings,
surveys, implementation timetable and other details on the Web at www.clemson.edu/masterplan.
|
Master Planning Task Force
James Barker, FAIA, University President
Brian Becknell, Classified Staff Senate President 2001-2002
Rita Bolt, Student Body President 2000-2001
Mendal Bouknight, Chief Development Officer
Rick Cotton, City Administrator for the City of Clemson
Craig Dawson, Graduate Student Government President 2000-2001
John Finn, College of Engineering and Science Representative
David Fleming, Director of Planning and Institutional Research
Alan Grubb, Associate Professor of History, Faculty Senate President
2001-2002
David Hamilton, Graduate Student Representative
Dori Helms, Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs
Almeda Jacks, Vice President for Student Affairs
John Jacques, Professor Emeritus of Architecture
Les Jones, Director of Capital Projects, Athletics
Gary Kirby, Student Body President 2001-2002
Jim London, Professor of Planning and Landscape Architecture
Scott Ludlow, Chief Business Officer
Angelo Mitsopoulos, Student Body President 2002-2003
Chris Przirembel, Vice President for Research
Sharon Richardson, Director of Planning and Codes Administration
for the City of Clemson
Janice Schach, FASLA, Dean of Architecture, Arts and Humanities
Yatish Shah, Chief Research Officer and
Senior Vice Provost 1997-2001
DeWitt Stone, Lecturer in the Office of External Instruction
Kinley Sturkie, Professor of Sociology, Faculty Senate President 2002-2003
Fred Switzer, Professor of Psychology, Faculty Senate President 2000-2001
Stassen Thompson, Director of Land Management
Bob Wells, Chief Facilities Officer
Allen Wood, AIA, Trustee, Vice President of Mosley Wilkins & Wood
Umit Yilmaz, Associate Professor of Planning and Landscape Architecture
Gerald Vander Mey, Director of Campus Planning |