Plant Growth Regulation by Photoselective Greenhouse
Covers:Current Status and Future Prospects
[
Light and Plant Growth |
Liquid Spectral Filters |
Plant Responses to Liquid Spectral Filters |
Physiological Basis of Light Quality Responses |
Commercialization of Spectral Filter Technology |
Current Concerns with Photoselective Films |
Development of photoselective covers
]
Height control of greenhouse
crops is an important practice to optimize efficient handling and rapid
establishment in the field. Many techniques are available, but chemical
height control has been the standard practice in commercial operations.
Because of potential health risks to consumers and concerns of environmental
pollution, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) have imposed restrictions on the use of growth
regulating chemicals in agriculture. Use of daminozide (Alar), once the
primary chemical used for controlling vegetable transplant height has been
banned in the United States. As a result, no chemical growth regulators
are currently labeled for height control of vegetable transplants in the
United States. Growers in other countries are facing similar restrictions
on using chemical growth regulators on food crops. Several research teams
around the world are investigating alternative height control measures,
such as gene manipulation, greenhouse temperature management, mechanical
conditioning, and light quality manipulation.
Plants have specialized pigment
systems that can capture radiant energy in different regions of the electromagnetic
spectrum. For example, photosynthetically active radiation (400-700
nm), captured by chlorophyll pigments, provides the energy for photosynthesis,
the process by which plants combine carbon dioxide and water to produce
oxygen and carbohydrates. Carbon assimilated during photosynthesis provides
the energy to sustain life on earth.
Light also acts as a signal
of environmental conditions surrounding the plants. There are photoreceptors
that function as signal transducers to provide information that controls
physiological and morphological responses. Through these pigments, plants
have the ability to perceive subtle changes in light composition for initiation
of physiological and morphological changes. This ability of light to control
plant morphology is independent of photosynthesis and is known as photomorphogenesis.
In photomorphogenesis, photons in specific regions of the spectrum are
perceived by the photoreceptors present in smaller quantities. Known photomorphogenic
receptors include phytochrome (the red and far-red light sensor that has
absorption peaks in red and far-red regions of the spectrum, respectively)
and "cryptochrome" (the hypothetical UV-B and blue light sensor).
Phytochrome is the most intensively
studied sensory pigment that controls photomorphogenesis. Phytochrome is
capable of detecting wavelengths from 300 to 800 nm with maximum sensitivity
in red (R, 600 to 700 nm with peak absorption at 660 nm) and far-red (FR,
700 to 800 nm with peak absorption at 730 nm) wavelengths of the spectrum.
This pigment system consists of two interconvertible forms: the Pr
form absorbs red light and upon absorption is transformed into the Pfr
form which absorbs far-red light and is transformed into the Pr
form. Of the two forms, the Pfr form is assumed to be the active
form that controls signal transduction and plant response.
Photon ratios between the
red and far-red region of the spectrum (R:FR ratio) and in vitro
estimates of phytochrome photoequilibrium (f)
[amount of phytochrome in the Pfr form relative to total phytochrome
(Pfr:Ptot at photoequilibrium)] have been commonly
used to quantitatively describe the phytochrome-mediated responses such
as stem elongation. In general, f depends largely
on the absorption of red and far-red wavelengths by the plant and therefore,
f
decreases with decreasing R:FR ratio. A hyperbolic relationship exists
between R:FR ratio and f indicating that a small
change in R:FR ratio can result in a large change in f
in the natural environment. Stem elongation rate and height of a range
of herbaceous plants have been shown to be inversely proportional to the
f
(i.e. higher the f shorter the plant).
Therefore, by manipulating the red and far-red light in the greenhouse
to establish a high f, height of greenhouse
crops can be controlled with minimum chemical applications.
Greenhouse light quality
manipulation can be achieved either with supplemental electric lighting
systems with relatively high red and low far-red light or by spectral filters
that can alter red and far-red light balance of sunlight. Incandescent
lamps, which are low in R:FR ratio, frequently lead to stem elongation
while fluorescent sources, which are high in R:FR ratio, produce short
and compact plants. Radiation filters, both liquid and rigid, for improving
greenhouse crop productivity and reducing greenhouse temperature gained
attention in the 1970s and considerable progress has been made since then.
[ Top ]
Channeled, double-walled
acrylic and polycarbonate plastic greenhouse glazings allow liquid dyes
to be contained in hollow channels of the glazing as filtering materials.
In the 1970s and 1980s, liquid filters were widely investigated for filtering
out infrared radiation (heat) from sunlight as a mean to cool greenhouses.
Van Bavel noted liquid radiation filters reduce energy requirements by
20%-40% and virtually eliminate the need for forced ventilation in greenhouses.
The ability of various aqueous dye filters [red, green, yellow, blue, and
copper sulfate (CuSO4•5H2O)]
to selectively remove elongation-stimulating far-red light from the natural
spectrum and to reduce plant height was investigated in the late 1980s
in Norway and in the USA. Of the different liquid filters tested only liquid
CuSO4 filters were effective in removing elongation-stimulating
far-red wavelengths from the sunlight (Fig. 1). The CuSO4 liquid
filter reduced both red and far-red wavelengths, but the reduction of far-red
was greater than the reduction of red wavelengths thus, resulting in a
high R:FR ratio and high f.
Figure 1. Spectral distribution under liquid red dye (#259), blue
dye #171 (CIBA-GEIGY, Greensboro, NC), and CuSO4 filters.
[ Top ]
[
Height and internode length |
Water use |
Flower development |
Dry matter accumulation and partitioning |
Carbohydrate status |
Postharvest quality ]
Reports from Norway indicated that liquid CuSO4 filters reduced
plant height and internode length of chrysanthemum, tomato, and lettuce
plants. Green and yellow filters increased plant height of these crops
compared to natural light. In chrysanthemum and tomato, lateral buds
were stimulated by CuSO4 filters but inhibited by green and
yellow filters. Poinsettia and two cultivars of chrysanthemum, ‘Spears’
and ‘Yellow Mandalay’, grown under CuSO4 filters had reduced
heights and internode lengths compared to control plants grown under natural
light or water filters. A later study evaluated the influence of concentration
of CuSO4 (4%, 8%, and 16%) in the filter on the growth of ‘Bright
Golden Anne’ chrysanthemums. Increasing the concentration of CuSO4
in the filter from 4% to 16% reduced PPF by 26% to 47%, respectively, compared
to control. Average plant height and internode length were reduced by about
35% regardless of the concentration, suggesting that concentrations as
low as 4% CuSO4 could be effectively used. Height reduction
under CuSO4 filters was caused mainly by the decrease in internode
length, as the number of nodes was not altered. In all these studies, the
PPF had been adjusted to be the same among all treatments.
In addition to height reduction,
plants grown under CuSO4 filters had more leaf chlorophyll,
darker green leaves, and were compact than control plants, similar to plants
treated with chemical growth regulators. Subsequent studies revealed that
a wide range of plants respond to CuSO4 filtered light (Table
1). Azalea and bulbs such as tulip, hyacinth, and daffodil did not
respond to CuSO4 filtered light.
Table 1. Plant height reduction in response to CuSO4 filtered
light.
|
Positive response
|
No response
|
|
Ageratum
|
Easter lily
|
Azalea
|
|
Geranium
|
Poinsettia
|
Tulip
|
|
Impatiens
|
Lettuce
|
Hyacinth
|
|
Pansy
|
Chrysanthemum
|
Narcissus
|
|
Pepper
|
Miniature roses
|
|
|
Petunia
|
Exacum
|
|
|
Salvia
|
Vinca
|
|
|
Tomato
|
Marigold
|
|
In chrysanthemums,
CuSO4 filtered light reduced height by Å30% in short photoperiod-grown
(fall and spring) plants but in long photoperiods (summer), plant height
reduction was Å20%. A similar response was observed with miniature
roses grown in short and long photoperiods.
Work with chrysanthemum
‘Bright Golden Anne’ indicated that plants grown under the CuSO4
filter had about 37% less cumulative water use than control plants. However,
water loss rate per unit leaf area was similar between plants grown under
CuSO4 and control filters suggesting this reduction in cumulative
water loss was due smaller plant size. Plants grown under the CuSO4
filter had lower stomatal density compared to control plants. Light transmitted
through the CuSO4 filter did not alter the size of individual
stomata. Total number of stomata and total stomatal pore area per plant
was about 50% less in plants grown under the CuSO4 filter than
those of control plants due to less leaf area.
The
influence of filtered light on flower development and flower quality varied
with plant species, cultivar, and growing season. In ‘Meijikatar’ miniature
roses, CuSO4 filters slightly accelerated (2-3 d) anthesis of
early spring grown plants but slightly delayed (2-3 d) anthesis of late
spring- and summer-grown plants. In ‘Bright Golden Anne’ chrysanthemums,
CuSO4
filters delayed anthesis by 7 d in early fall-grown (September)
plants and by 13 d in late fall-grown (December) plants. Spectral filters
did not affect total number of flowers, but plants grown under CuSO4
filters
produced smaller flowers than control in both miniature roses and chrysanthemums.
In ‘Spears’ chrysanthemums, CuSO4 filters promoted earlier flowering
under non-inductive natural long days compared to control plants. However,
under artificial short days, CuSO4 did not affect the time to
flower in ‘Spears’ chrysanthemums. In ‘Nellie White’ Easter lilies, CuSO4
filters did not delay anthesis or reduce flower size.
Total shoot dry weight of chrysanthemums decreased when plants were grown
under CuSO4 filters. Shoot dry matter partitioning was also
affected by CuSO4 filters; reduced stem dry matter accumulation
and increased leaf dry matter accumulation. This suggests that the translocation
of photosynthates may be affected by light quality under CuSO4
filters. The dry weights per unit leaf area and the unit length of stem
were reduced by light transmitted through the CuSO4 filter.
CuSO4
filters also reduced both leaf and stem total soluble sugars (sucrose,
glucose, and fructose) and starch concentrations in miniature roses and
chrysanthemums. However, the magnitude of reduction varied with the growing
season; greater in spring than in fall. For example, CuSO4 filters
reduced leaf soluble sugar concentration by approximately 54% in spring-grown
chrysanthemum plants but only 29% in fall-grown plants. The reduction in
carbohydrate pools may be a result of reduced photosynthesis or increased
respiration of plants grown under CuSO4 filters. Our preliminary
work with chrysanthemums indicated that the rate of photosynthesis was
lower in plants grown under CuSO4 filters than under control
filters but rate of respiration was not different.
The reduced carbohydrate
levels of plants grown under CuSO4 filters could lead to adverse
effects on postharvest longevity. Work with miniature roses indicated that
postharvest quality was reduced and leaf yellowing increased in plants
grown under CuSO4 filters compared to control plants. In Easter
lilies and chrysanthemums, CuSO4 spectral filters reduced flower
shelf life by 3 to 4 d compared to control plants. Plants subjected
to 4 oC storage for 1 week before being placed in an interior
environment exhibited even less shelf life.
[ Top ]
Gibberellins (GAs) are a
group of plant growth hormones involved in a wide range of plant processes
such as germination, cell division, cell elongation, flowering and fruit
set and development. Endogenous gibberellins play an important role in
the control of stem elongation and internode length. Chemical growth retardants
reduce plant height by suppressing the production of natural gibberellins
and there are similarities between the effects of chemical growth regulators
and CuSO4 spectral filters. Therefore, it is possible that GA
biosynthesis or its action may be suppressed under CuSO4 spectral
filters.
Stem elongation in response
to changes in light quality may be mediated by changes in GA level or sensitivity
to GA. In efforts to understand the physiological basis for growth control
by spectral filters, we applied 50 mg•L-1
(ppm) GA3 (Pro-Gibb) on the first day of spectral filter treatment
or weekly to chrysanthemum plants grown under control or CuSO4
spectral filters. Both single and weekly applications of GA3
reversed the plant height reduction caused by CuSO4 filters,
but the weekly applications were more effective than the single application.
We also applied 3500 mg•L-1 of daminozide
(B-Nine), a known gibberellin biosynthesis inhibitor, weekly to chrysanthemum
plants grown under control and CuSO4 filters. Daminozide treatment
reduced plant height under both CuSO4 and control filters but
the effect was greatest under the control filter.
The level of GA-like substances
in apical regions is known to be high in plants treated with far-red light.
Exposure to end-of-day far-red light reversed the reduction of plant height
and internode length caused by the CuSO4 filters to a level
comparable with plants that received no end-of-day far-red treatment under
control filters. Exposure to end-of-day red light reduced height and internode
length of chrysanthemum plants grown under control filters but had no effect
under CuSO4 filters. Exposure to end-of-day far-red did not
significantly alter height and internode length under control filters.
Observations with exogenous GA application and with end-of-day exposure
to red or far-red light suggest that reduction of gibberellin levels by
CuSO4 filter may be, at least partially, responsible for plant
height reduction.
Gibberellin biosynthesis
is a complex process that involves several enzymes and intermediate gibberellins.
The current research focuses on quantifying the endogenous gibberellin
levels (GA19, GA20, and GA1) and on investigating
the responses of spectral-filter-grown chrysanthemum plants to intermediate
gibberellins (GA19 and GA20) in the GA biosynthetic
pathway. Our quantification studies indicate that GA19 levels
(inactive) were higher and GA1 (active) levels were lower in
CuSO4 filter grown plants than in control plants. The response
of CuSO4 filter grown plants to exogenous GA19 was
lower than control plants. These preliminary observations suggest that
the conversion of GA19 to GA20 may be reduced under
the CuSO4 filters.
[ Top ]
Although our early research
has demonstrated that light manipulation by liquid CuSO4 filters
have the potential for being a non-chemical alternative for height control
of greenhouse plants, liquid spectral filter technology has limited value
to commercial growers because of difficulties in material handling and
high initial construction costs. In addition, CuSO4 is hazardous
and can be phytotoxic in the event of spills.
For spectral filter technology
to be acceptable commercially, an easy-to-handle plastic greenhouse covering
or shading material with the ability to filter out far-red light must be
developed. Although a plastic material with far-red removing properties
is not commercially available at present, several plastic and pigment manufacturers
have shown interest in developing such material. The Clemson University
researchers are currently collaborating with Mitsui Chemicals, Inc., Tokyo,
Japan to develop photoselective greenhouse plastic films or rigid plastic
panels.
[ Top ]
Mitsui
Chemicals, Inc. identified two pigments that absorb far-red light from
the natural spectrum and that are stable in polyethylene films or rigid
plastic panels. Initial trials focused on identifying a suitable dye and
dye concentration that effectively filters out far-red light from sunlight
and reduces plant height while minimizing the reduction in light transmission.
Mitsui Chemicals, Inc produced rigid plastic panels containing five dye
concentrations from each dye. These were identified as control, YBM-1/YBM-10
#85, YBM-1/YBM-10 #75, YMB-1/YBM-10 #65, and YBM-1/YBM-10 #55. The number
followed by the YBM indicates the code of the dye. As the dye concentration
in the panels increased, the absorption of far-red light increased but
the light transmission decreased. The number followed by YBM-1 or YBM-10
indicates the percentage light transmission through each panel. Growth
chambers (1 m x 0.8 m x 0.8 m) were built with each of these
materials and growth of bell pepper, tomato, petunia, and watermelon seedlings
and chrysanthemums cuttings were evaluated inside each of the chambers.
All chambers were kept inside a greenhouse and the amount of light inside
each chamber was adjusted with neutral density filters (cheesecloth or
shade cloth) to be the same among all chambers.
Both types of far-red light
absorbing photoselective filters reduced height of all species tested in
preliminary trails but the magnitude of height reduction varied with the
species. (Table 2 and
Figure
2). In general, watermelon seedlings showed the greatest height
reduction followed by bell peppers, tomato, and chrysanthemum. Number of
leaves was not affected, indicating that height reductions were caused
by shorter internodes. The height reduction increased as the dye concentration
in the panels increased but total shoot dry weight was reduced because
of the severe light reduction as the dye concentration increased. Therefore,
a dye concentration that gives a light transmission of 75% was selected
for photoselective film production and further experimentation.
Table 2. Effect of dye concentrations in YBM-1 and YBM-10 photoselective
chambers on height of chrysanthemum, watermelon, bell pepper, and tomato
plants. The number followed by the film indicates the percent light transmission
through the panels. Percentage height reductions compared to control plants
are given in parentheses.
|
|
Plant height (cm)
|
|
|
Material
|
Chrysanthemum
|
Watermelon
|
Bell pepper
|
Tomato
|
|
Control
|
29.7
|
28.4
|
22.1
|
-
|
|
YBM-1 #85
|
26.6 (-10)
|
21.7 (-24)
|
17.2 (-22)
|
-
|
|
YBM-1 #75
|
23.7 (-20)
|
14.6 (-49)
|
13.9 (?37)
|
-
|
|
YBM-1 #65
|
20.9 (-30)
|
14.5 (-49)
|
13.9 (-37)
|
-
|
|
YBM-1 #55
|
21.8 (-27)
|
14.9 (-48)
|
12.0 (-46)
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control
|
30.2
|
52.3
|
14.5
|
35.0
|
|
YBM-10 #85
|
31.0 (+3)
|
38.9 (-26)
|
11.2 (-23)
|
32.5 (-7)
|
|
YBM-10 #75
|
25.9 (-14)
|
38.1 (-27)
|
10.0 (-31)
|
23.2 (-34)
|
|
YBM-10 #65
|
26.2 (-13)
|
35.0 (-33)
|
9.9 (-31)
|
23.4 (-33)
|
|
YBM-10 #55
|
27.0 (-11)
|
33.2 (-37)
|
9.6 (-34)
|
23.7 (-32)
|
Based on initial findings,
photoselective greenhouse films with red and far-red light absorbing films
(SXE-4 and YXE-10 films, respectively) were produced with a dye concentration
that results in a 75% light transmission (light spectrum of two types of films). Growth of several vegetable
transplants and ornamental bedding plants was evaluated inside
growth
chambers covered with these films. The results are summarized
in Table 3. Plants produced under the far-red light absorbing film were,
in general, shorter (except snapdragon and miniature roses) than the control
plants while plants produced under the red light absorbing film had similar
or increased height compared to the control plants. The magnitude of height
reduction varied with the species and cultivar.
We also evaluated flowering
of selected ornamental crops inside the chambers under natural short day
conditions. Flowering of miniature rose plants was not affected (Table
3). Flowering of cosmos, zinnia, and chrysanthemum (short day plants) was
slightly delayed (by 1-2 days) under the far-red light absorbing film.
Photoselective films had the greatest influence on flowering of snapdragon
and petunia (long-day plants). Flowering of these species was delayed by
7-13 days under the far-red light absorbing films. Red light absorbing
film did not significantly affect flowering of these species tested.
Table 3. Influence of red and far-red light absorbing plastic
films (SXE-4 and YXE-10, respectively) on plant height and flower development
(days to anthesis, DA) under natural short days of selected crops. Control
is a clear polyethylene film.
|
Control film
|
SXE-4 film
|
YXE-10 film
|
|
Crop
|
Height
(cm)
|
DA
(days)
|
Height
(cm)
|
DA
(days)
|
Height
(cm)
|
DA
(days)
|
| Vegetable crops |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cucumber
‘Sweet Success’ |
17.3 b
|
-
|
19.8 a
|
-
|
8.6 c
|
-
|
| Tomato‘Mountain
Pride’ |
15.0 a
|
-
|
15.8 a
|
-
|
11.2 b
|
-
|
| Bell
pepper ‘Capistrano’ |
11.1 a
|
-
|
11.4 a
|
-
|
8.4 b
|
-
|
| Ornamental crops |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Snapdragon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'Ribbon White’
|
48.3 b
|
63 b
|
53.8 a
|
61 b
|
48.9 b
|
70 a
|
|
‘Tahiti Red’
|
25.5 a
|
51 b
|
24.7 ab
|
50 b
|
23.0 b
|
59 a
|
| Florida pink |
23.6 b
|
26 a
|
27.2 a
|
27 a
|
22.5 b
|
25 a
|
| Florida blue |
31.2 a
|
30 a
|
30.4 a
|
28 a
|
27.9 b
|
31 a
|
| Florida sky blue |
26.7 ab
|
30 a
|
28.1 a
|
30 a
|
23.4 b
|
32 a
|
| Petunia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
‘Supercascade Burgandy’
|
-
|
53 b
|
-
|
54 b
|
-
|
66 a
|
| Zinnia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
‘Pumila Mix’
|
24.5 b
|
33 ab
|
28.4 a
|
32 b
|
18.8 c
|
35 a
|
|
‘Cherry Ruffles’
|
38.0 a
|
35 c
|
40.9 a
|
36 b
|
30.4 b
|
37 a
|
| Cosmos |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ‘Sonata White’ |
37.3 a
|
26 a
|
38.1 a
|
27 a
|
33.5 b
|
27 a
|
| Miniature rose |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ‘Cherry Cupido’ |
28.8 a
|
46 a
|
29.2 a
|
46 a
|
27.2 a
|
46 a
|
| Chrysanthemum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ‘Bright Golden Anne’ |
32.6 b
|
64 a
|
34.6 a
|
65 a
|
28.4 c
|
65 a
|
| ‘Iridon’ |
22.6 b
|
59 a
|
25.8 a
|
60 a
|
19.8 c
|
62 a
|
| ‘Yellow Snowden’ |
50.8 a
|
55 a
|
50.4 a
|
57 a
|
40.7 b
|
56 a
|
| Pachystachys
lutea |
30.1 b
|
38 a
|
32.8 a
|
38 a
|
27.0 c
|
38 a
|
| Strobilanthes
dyerianus |
34.2 ab
|
-
|
38.9 a
|
-
|
30.2 b
|
|
[ Top ]
One draw back of the photoselective
films that we tested is their short film life. We have evaluated the film
life under both protected (in a greenhouse) and unprotected (exposed to
full sun) conditions at Clemson University and at a nursery research site
(Carolina Nursery, Monks Corner, SC). Films tested in the greenhouse lasted
longer (over one year) than those films tested under natural conditions.
The dye in the films tested under unprotected conditions began to degrade
during the first year of exposure (10 to 12 months). Short film life is
a limitation to the commercial applications of the photoselective films
we tested but experiments are being conducted to increase the stability
of the dyes in the films under natural environments. Using the photoselective
film as the inner layer of a double layered poly house may help extend
the life of the films. Experiments are currently underway to test the film
in this type of situations.
Another concern of using
photoselective films is that the reduction of light transmission may limit
their use in low light seasons and in the northern latitudes where sunlight
is limited. In a given day, the red:far-red ratio of sunlight is relatively
constant (about 1.1) from sunrise to sunset; however, during a half-hour-period
before sunrise or after sunset, red:far-red ratio is reduced due to the
increase in far-red light. Therefore, exposing plants to far-red light
absorbing photoselective films at the end of the day may help effectively
exclude far-red light in the evening while maximizing the light during
the daytime. We are currently testing the use of photoselective films as
an end of the day curtain to block far-red light during the evening hours.
Preliminary experiments were conducted with cucumber by exposing seedlings
continuously to far-red light absorbing films or by exposing seedlings
to films at the end of the day (from 3:00 PM to 9:00 AM or from 5:00 PM
to 9:00 AM, in October to November). Treatments were terminated after 15
days. The shortest plants were those grown continuously in far-red light
absorbing (YXE-10) chambers (Figure
3). End of the day exposure to YXE-10 film was also effective
in height reduction. However, the height reduction by end of the day exposure
(25% height reduction) was not as high as continuous exposure (44% height
reduction). There was no difference in height between the two end of the
day exposure treatments to YXE-10 film, indicating that later exposure
to film was as effective.
Plants grown continuously
in YXE-10 chambers had the lowest shoot dry weight. Dry weight of end of
the day exposed plants was greater than continuous YXE-10 plants, suggesting
that end of the day exposure can minimize the dry weight reduction. By
using photoselective film as an end of the day curtain, film life may also
be extended. Although effective with cucumbers, to make this strategy commercially
useful, a wide range of crops must be tested. If effective with a range
of crops, this will provide an opportunity to maximize the use of sunlight
during the daytime and achieve a reasonable height reduction without using
chemicals.
As the general public becomes
more concerned with the chemical use, interest in using non-chemical alternatives
to regulate plant growth and to control pests and diseases will increase.
With the commercial development of photoselective greenhouse covers or
shade material in the near future, nursery and greenhouse industry could
reduce costs for growth regulating chemicals, reduce health risks to their
workers and consumers, and reduce potential environmental pollution.
[ Top ]
The mission of Clemson University's Department of Horticulture
is to promote personal and professional growth through the
discovery, communication, and application of horticultural
experiences, knowledge, and scholarship. Our work fosters
environmental stewardship while improving economic wellbeing,
health, and quality of life for all.
|