Congratulations to the following recipients of departmental awards:
Continue Reading →
Congratulations to the following recipients of departmental awards:
For this week’s discussion group, Jenna and Nate has arranged for the iTiger team to present their research and development project, which is in need of human centered design and usability testing expertise. This presentation will allow us as a department to explore an opportunity for interdisciplinary collaboration and new possibilities for courses and credit. The iTiger team is made up of computer science, information management, and business graduate and undergraduate students. Currently the students are enrolled for 1 credit hour of Creative Inquiry, but plan on increasing this to two or three credit hours in the future. We will discuss and demo their technology as well as how their departments are dealing with interdisciplinary projects/classes such as this in their curriculum. Continue Reading →
Rachel Rosenberg: The Effects of Headlight Intensity and Clothing Contrast on Pedestrian’s Estimates…
“The Effects of Headlight Intensity and Clothing Contrast on Pedestrian’s Estimates of their own Visibility at Night” by Rachel Rosenberg.
Thursday, January 28, 2010
HF student Linnea Smolentzov’s paper, “Older and Younger Adults Perceptions of ‘Smart’ Furniture”, was chosen as outstanding paper at the 6th Annual Aging Research Day, South Carolina.
A few researchers from the Microsoft User Experience (UX) Research Group will be visiting the Clemson Psychology Department next week, Thursday and Friday, February 11 and 12.
At our Human Factors Discussion Group on Friday 2/12, they will give a presentation about UX Research at Microsoft and answer questions from the faculty and students.
If anyone has specific topics that they would like the Microsoft researchers to cover, send your request to Lee Gugerty in advance (email@example.com) and he will relay them to the Microsoft folks. Of course, you can also ask informal questions during the talk.
IMPORTANT TIME NOTE: HFDG next week, February 12, will be held at a DIFFERENT TIME than usual: 2:00 – 3:15 PM (but in the usual location, 419 Brackett)
Investigations in Perception-Action Behaviors and Peer Influences in an Immersive Bicycling Simulator
Our guest speaker for this Week’s HF Discussion Group will be Sabarish Babu, a new professor in Clemson’s Division of Human-Centered Computing.
The title of his talk is “Investigations in Perception-Action Behaviors and Peer Influences in an Immersive Bicycling Simulator,” and a sampling of his research can be seen here: http://people.clemson.edu/~sbabu/index_files/Page477.htm
As usual, we will meet on Friday at 2:30 in the Psychology Conference Room, 419 Brackett Hall (accessible through room 418, across from the top of the ‘angled’ atrium stairs).
For this week’s HF Discussion Group Alan will present on some of the court cases that he has been working on.
Topics will include building codes, ADA, ANSI, signage and a new case with a serious accident involving a driver’s site distance and poor visibility.
As usual, we will meet Friday at 2:30 in the Psychology Conference Room, 419 Brackett Hall (accessible through room 418, across from the top of the ‘angled’ atrium stairs).
- Thursday, February 4, 2010
- 11:00 AM
- Brackett 414
Are Distracted Drivers Aware that they are Distracted? Exploring Awareness, Self-regulation, and Performance in Drivers Performing Secondary Tasks
Research has shown that driving while talking on a mobile telephone is likely to cause
drivers’ to fail to see relevant events. However, distraction has been shown to have little
effect on lane-keeping ability. This pattern is similar to research on driving performance
at night suggesting that some problems associated with distraction may parallel those of
The current investigation seeks to investigate whether drivers identify and react to their
own performance decrements while distracted and whether they notice differences in
lane-keeping versus identification performance. It is hypothesized that drivers will
expect robust driving performance while distracted and will not report differences in the
effect of distraction on lane-keeping ability and visual recognition ability.
- Student: Stacy Balk
- Date: Wednesday December 2
- Time: 9:15 AM
- Location: 419 Brackett Hall
The accuracy of observers’ estimates of the effect of glare on nighttime vision: Do we exaggerate the disabling effects of glare?
Designing headlights involves balancing two conflicting goals: maximizing visibility for the driver and minimizing the disabling effects of glare for other drivers. In recent years, especially since the introduction of high intensity discharge headlamps, there have been a large number of complaints about headlight glare. It is unknown whether these complaints are more motivated by glare-induced feelings of discomfort or by drivers’ belief that headlight glare is disrupting their ability to see at night. Two experiments – a lab-based psychophysical study and an outdoor field study – are proposed to quantify the accuracy of observers’ estimates of the effects of glare on vision. It is hoped that the results of these two studies will aid in understanding the relationship between the perceived and actual effects of glare on vision.
- Student: Jeremy Mendel
- Date: November 30th, 2009
- Time: 2:00 p.m.
- Location: Brackett 419
The effect of Interface Consistency and Cognitive Load on user performance in an information search task
Although interface consistency is theorized to increase performance and user satisfaction, previous research has found mixed and often non-significant results. The source of this discrepancy may be due to varying levels of task difficulty employed in these past studies. This study attempted to control the task difficulty using the cognitive load theory. Interface consistency was manipulated along with intrinsic cognitive load and extraneous cognitive load. Interface consistency was manipulated along all three dimensions: physical, communicational and conceptual. Intrinsic cognitive load was manipulated by asking participants finance (high intrinsic load) questions and travel (low intrinsic load) questions. Unnecessary and irrelevant extra hyperlinks were used to manipulate extraneous cognitive load. These hyperlinks were either present (high extraneous load) or absent (low extraneous load) in the websites. Forty eight participants searched for answers to 24 questions across four separate websites. Effects of the manipulations were measured by calculating task completion time, error-rate, the total pages navigated, average time spent on each page and participant’s subjective ease-of-use score. A three-way interaction was observed for between consistency and the two types of cognitive load. Specifically, a reduction in errors for the consistent condition was observed in the high cognitive load conditions. These findings suggest that consistency may be especially important in situations with high cognitive load.