|

B
& B
Our first opinion
of the American landscape was conditioned by our European upbringing.
The urban setting, the landscape, and the Botanical Garden seemed
to be "loose", in a developmental stage looking toward the future.
The emergence of ecological and land-oriented concerns reinforced
the idea of an unrealized potential. In Europe, landscapes are usually
"licked clean" and the notion of a common patrimony often freezes
them in a configuration.In comparison, the Botanical Garden seemed
more like a forest. It was our great luck that we could interpose
ourselves in a space and a program offering an open-mindedness so
rarely found in Europe.
Our artistic
involvement could express itself fully, not as a lesson but as a
proposition. We are devoted neither solely to art or to landscape:
without excluding one or the other, we are raising in an ecological
way - a scientific, ethical and sociological way - the question
of inter-human relations and how they, in turn, relate to a chosen
site. The piece is seen in different ways according to whether you
penetrate it or walk around it.
|
|
|
Everything is
in opposition: the shadows and lights, the plants, and the slopes.
From there, from "that," images are born. They fly out in a more
or less furtive state and bang into each other in the rhythm of
the arrangements that canalize -- suggesting the fluid and crawling
animality of the stream, of a serpent The Stream Path.
Is it a sculpture? Not really. It comes from the materialization
of a process and it will transform itself through decay, the growth
of plants, the cresting of the stream and the natural order of things
imposed through the annual cycles. It will also evolve and melt
progressively into the landscape according to the desires of those
who take care of it and the diversions of those who visit it.
1998
|