American ideas about
technology
- the blood pressure
cuff was
initially rejected by doctors because it took away the value of their
skill in reading the patient directly by pulse
diagnosis.
- The machine gave more
accurate information, but other information was lost.
- technology often takes away
the value of a skill that workers have
- doctors had the power to
reject at least temporarily a new technology
- this shows how our ideas
about technology influence the development of technology
1914 patent for blood pressure cuff
We think about technology in
different ways:
- we compare it to nature
(the other way of doing things is more natural)--eg. genetic
engineered
foods
- U.S.--is the end result
natural
- England--is
the means
of getting there natural
- Germany--is the
research organized in an open and fair way, don't do research until you
have dealt with possible ethical concerns
- we ask about costs (what is the cost/benefit ratio)
- how do we value accurate limited information relative to
broad subjective information--how sure do we feel we need to be before
acting on information
- we think about how it
affects social status
- we think about how it
affects skill
- how does it affect being able to take pride in work
- we think about how it
relates to gender--eg. robot
lawn mowers
- it will confuse our ideas about the family (and we value
families)
- we ask questions about God
(are
we playing God?)
- and we compare it with our
ideas of government--eg. the automobile fits American ideas of freedom
and individualism
- in the early republic
people worried about whether technology was following God's will--eg.
pain relief for childbirth
- the romantics worried about
what technology was doing to skill--the loss of creative
expression. But those who favored technology argued that it would
liberate people, not enslave them.
These give us different questions to ask about a new technology
and how it comes into use. The more questions we can ask, the
better choices we can make about what technological future we want.
some artists of the mid-20th
century tried to romaticize and poeticize the man-made world.
iron and steel were the defining new material, as in suspension
bridges such as the Brooklyn Bridge
-
Brooklyn Bridge
The Brooklyn Bridge
was completed in 1883, connecting Manhattan and Brooklyn, the longest
suspension bridge in the world at the time
- John Roebling was the foremost bridge designer of
his time and had built several other major suspension bridges ( company
history ). He had earned a degree in civil engineering in
Germany, at a time when there was no school in the United States
offering engineering degrees (except in effect West Point)
- he had invented a way of making wire cables that
made suspension bridges more economical and he also understood better
than other engineers at the time how to make them safe
- the politics of funding the bridge were nasty
- work began on the bridge in Jan. 1870
- John Roebling died of tetanus during
construction, his son Washington A. Roebling took up the work but was
paralyzed by cassion disease (what scuba divers call the bends--the
harmful effects of nitrogen bubbles in the body if you go from high to
normal pressure air too quickly). Washington's wife Emily
Warren Roebling became the construction supervisor and saw the
bridge to completion. (more
on casualties )
- the bridge made a connection that made possible a
larger New York City (at the time it was built Brooklyn was a separate
city--Brooklyn, Queens, Staten Island, the Bronx and Manhattan were
consolidated into one city in 1898).
- some people were bothered by its bare utility,
they thought of architecture on the basis of decoration
- but aesthetics were changing to celebrate
utility--modern architecture wanted to get rid of all that old
decoration and celebrate functional form

how do our romantic and other
ideas about technology affect what technologies we like and what we
don't like?
Diego Rivera at work
on the Central Panel, North Wall, Detroit Institute of Arts
click
here to see one of the finished Detroit murals