Is technology progressing faster now than it did around
1900 or 1840?
If you look at the number of patents issued per
year, technology is obviously progressing faster and faster
but patents have to be approved, not everything that is
invented is patented, not everything that is patented is significant
it
isn't clear that all these inventions are changing our lives
as much as peoples lives were changed by the 1920s by the telephone,
the automobile, the airplane, etc.
some technologies have a more radical effect on our lives
than others, an awful lot of patents are for minor improvements rather
than something really new
Technologies tend to grow faster than linear growth (exponentially)
Leinhard shows the growth of speed in a chart where speed increases as
a straight line, but look at the y axis measurement of speed--it isn't
100, 200, 300 but 100, 1000, 10,000. His chart shows exponential
growth, not linear growth
Have you heard of a similar pattern in the increasing speed of
computers (and more fundamentally the number of components in an
integrated circuit) called Moore's
law--computer speeds have been doubling every one or two years for
over 50
years.
Not everything follows exponential growth:
Why don't we build taller and taller buildings in the same
pattern
of
exponential increase?
Leinhard says because we don't have so
clear a motivation to build taller buildings.
Look at the dates
on a
chart of the worlds tallest buildings--the Empire State Building
built in 1931 is still the world's ninth tallest building
taller and taller buildings are not profitable
thre are a lot of other factors that go into what is
progress--progress can't be measured by a single measure
If you have trouble understanding the equations on p.
123, let me give
you a simpler explanation
Leinhard wants to measure how fast the exponential growth is.
Does the measure of the technology (speed or whatever)
double every 2 years or every 30 years?
Leinhard measures this differently--his measure is how much
does a technology increase in 30 years (roughly one person's
career). Land speed doubled (actually a little faster than
doubled--2.06 rather than 2.00) every 30 years from 1790 to 1965
The other measure he uses, the time constant, is something
like the time it takes the technology to double (actually it is the
time it takes the technology to increase by 2.7 times, not just to
double)
You can make a similar graph for the efficiency of a steam engine
(how much energy do you have to burn to do a given amount of work) or
for the speed of flying vehicles (starting with dirigibles--powered
balloons)