Nye ch. 6

Does technology make us all richer?  Certainly in one sense poor people today have a lot more than poor people did 100 years ago.

Watch out for Nye's use of the word "liberal."  He is using it in an economic history sense--technological/economic liberals believe that technological progress and economic growth are good things.  In that sense most political conservatives are technological liberals and some political liberals are not technological liberals.

Nye is using liberal to mean pro-technology (as in economic liberalism)

Is technological progress and economic growth always a good thing?  Most of you probably automatically answer yes, but in this chapter you need to stop and think about that. 

Is technological progress/growth always a good thing?
If we look at the environment, it is easier to question progress. 
John the Baptist in the Wilderness
St. John in a not very wild wildernessone thing that is being lost is wilderness
the root meaning of the word wilderness is uncontrolled (while technology is ways of controlling our environment)
There isn't any wilderness left:

long view of Dartmoor

as we control nature more and more there is the danger we will turn wilderness into something like a zoo
do we lose something then?

technological progress may mean environmental loss
So we may want to take seriously the environmental costs of technological progress

Questioning the harm done by technology is not new:

what was the result of such questionning?
A couple of examples of how this has shifted:
The use of technology makes our production more efficient
  • increased productivity in agriculture  is one measure of how technological progress makes us richer--for each person employed in agriculture our technological agriculture produces enough food to feed more and more people.
  • factories make more at lower cost and with fewer workers
  • working conditions in the U.S. hit a low in the 1890s but then improved:
    • wages were being cut, sometimes 20% at once, in many factories in the 1890s
    • immigration meant a surplus of workers and immigrant workers often were afraid to press for better conditions
    • work days were still often 12 hours
    • the new big companies resulted in a new class of extremely rich families (eg. Rockefeller, Carnegie, J. P. Morgan, Vanderbilt), sometimes called Robber Barons.  The workers felt that all the benefits from the new technology were going to the rich, while the poor were getting poorer
  • child labor was widely used ( photos )

 spinning in Georgia
  • demands for reform began with the progressive movement--the government should protect workers and consumers
  • But then low unemployment during World War I (1.4%) meant that workers got what they wanted without radical fights--by 1919 almost 50% of workers had 8 hour day
  • by 1920 many workers could afford consumer goods made cheap by mass production, including automobiles
  • in the 1950s predictions were common that by the end of the century people would work less than 30 hours a week and have more vacation time and be able to retire younger.  This was a prediction that existing trends would continue.  Technology would continue to take away the burden of work
  Is the progress we have seen in standards of living sustainable?
  • irrigation leads to the build up of salt in the soil which makes it unfarmable
  • our farming practices result in the cumulative loss of topsoil
  • global warming, due both to the internal combustion engine and much of the generating of electricity, is predicted to result in an increase in sea level of 6 to 10 meters in the next 100 years--what would the effect of that be on coastal cities like Charleston?

Are we ready to face limits?

This page written and copyright Pamela E. Mack
HIST 122
last updated 11/25/06