physical and biological
changes the
environment has undergone--mostly studied by ecologists
how have human actions
(human history) resulted in changes in the ecosystem
historians contribute how
the way we see things (the meanings we give to things) has changed
the history of the
environmental movement (history of ideas and political activism)
history of government
action related to the environment
how our ideas about nature
have changed--history of ideas
history of attitudes: what
does our country
generally care to do about the environment (government action and
individual behavior)
We have a problem where we are
harming our environment. Start with history:
when did that problem start
how has the problem changed
over time
have people tried to fix
the problem and has that worked?
if it didn't work maybe we
can learn mistakes to avoid
what has it taken in the
past to motivate people to fix such problems
What are the important issues--the
factors that affect history when we look at the environment:
the growth of
technology--Technology can create some problems and help fix others,
but technology will not magically solve all our problems
historians of technology think
some technologies lead us in the right direction and some lead us in
the wrong direction--we need to choose carefully
ecology and natural
resources matter--our
environment shapes our history
the drive to expand (both
earlier empires and today)
human ideas matter
Nash talks about approaches
to conservation and ideas about wilderness--the ideas we have today
about how to do good for the environment are not the same as in earlier
times
how has our idea of
wilderness changed--to answer look carefully at how different people
define wilderness
politics matters--broad
definition of politics, not just who gets elected but also how laws are
made and enforced, changes in public opinion
the problem of waste--a problem
that grows more serious as population increases and consumption
increases
example nanosilver
washing
machine may threaten the working of sewage treatment plants
consumption--can we
continue to increase, or if not what do we do?
different groups of historians
ask quite different questions
not just neutral facts
always a selection of facts
usually also interpretation
What is this particular author
trying to do?
what have you learned from this course that will help you understand
environmental issues today?
how complex environmental
issues are
values are always involved,
you can't come up with a technological right answer
different people mean
different things by wilderness, nature--our ideas about what is natural
and what is unnatural play a very big role in what we think should be
done (when we get used to something we think it is natural, even if it
isn't)
pay attention to where you
get your information from--even the experts are often biassed
1. how much can human beings
change ecosystems
Europeans went out and
conquered much of the rest of the world--what was the ecological impact
of this
this involved changing
ecosystems as well as political conquest
why was this successful?
human history is tightly
connected to the ecosystem people live in
we are not separate from
nature but our story is woven in with the story of how nature has
changed
2. How have our ideas
changed? is it ideas that matter most? ideas and technology
affect each other
ideas about wilderness are
shaped by: religion, how much we can control the environment, political
need for something to be proud of to bring the nation together, ideas
of writers and artists, reactions against how capitalism and the
industrial revolution are changing the world, the fear that the
frontier is necessary to make us virtuous citizens, growing
urbanization and scarcity of wilderness, individual experiences,
growing science of ecology, the decline in general acceptance of
religious arguments...
our ideas about wilderness
are uniquely American (in other countries people have quite different
ideas)
our way of seeing the world
can change quite radically and quite quickly (out of longer-term trends)
3. how do you accomplish anything?
both by individual behavior
(including both activities and public opinion) and by government action
government is generally the
most effective way to act on issues of the public good (because of the
tragedy of the commons)
public opinion matters--you
need to have an
effective combination of citizen concern and expertise
the environmental movement
is a way of organizing individual views to create change on a
government level
you need to consider how
laws are written, passed, enforced, changed
what is the best place in
the system of government to put pressure about a particular issue
sometimes what is most
needed is new laws
in the 1970s lawsuits
were often most effective
by 2000 more conservative
judges had been appointment and environmentalists won fewer lawsuits
sometimes we need more
research and development
sometimes the issue is
enforcement--are the necessary organizations in place
growing scientific
knowledge isn't easy to handle in the political process
we need to realize that the
scientific understanding of these issues is going to keep changing
4.
what does all of this
add up to?
what do we want from the
environment?
what services do humans get
from the environment:
our food grows
some pollution is cleaned
up by natural processes
a place for recreation
a sense of peace, maybe
spiritual benefits
should we be concerned
only about how the environment affects us, or should we want to protect
the
environment for its own sake?
is concern about the
environment just a luxury for the rich? but many people are
affected
how do we balance progress
and economic growth with concerns about the environment
growth is most important
and we shouldn't let environmental concerns get in the way?
in order to protect our
environment we need to slow growth and settle for less?
technology is going to
allow us to have both growth and environmental protection at the same
time?
do progress and economic
growth always hurt the environment?
we tend to think of
ourselves as separate from nature, think of nature and culture as
opposites, but we aren't so separate
we have choices--one
particular future is not inevitable
to make good choices we
need to try to think about the future and what we want, even if it
can't be predicted
we need to have lots of
strategies and figure out which one will work in any given case
we need to think about the
consequences of how we live our lives
we can't keep thinking that
nature will take care of us--what do we need to do to take care of
nature?