Predicting Potential Loss
from Southern Pine
Beetle in the
Piedmont of South Carolina
Forest insect and disease pests cause an estimated growth loss and mortality in excess of $8 million each year in South Carolina forests. An integrated pest management (IPM) approach on your forest lands could significantly minimize your potential losses.

Determining Stand Susceptibility to Southern Pine Beetle
The key to preventing forest pest problems is understanding the closely associated pest, tree, and site factors that make a stand susceptible to attack. In recent years, systems have been developed using this relationship, which easily and reliably determine where pest attacks are most likely to occur. These systems are commonly known as risk and/or hazard rating systems. Although the terms risk and hazard are often used interchangeably, they have distinct meanings from one system to another.
Forest managers concerned with southern pine beetle (SPB) impact may use an appropriate rating system to determine which stands are most susceptible. The results of such stand ratings will provide guidance in determining areas needing cultural treatment to prevent losses from the SPB. Before using any rating system, managers should be certain that the system applies to their specific situation.
SPB Rating System for the Piedmont
The following rating system is appropriate for natural pine stands in the Piedmont region of South Carolina. It allows the user to rate a stand for the likelihood of an SPB spot (infestation) occurring, chance of a spot spreading, and potential for timber loss. It can be used in the field by taking a simple cruise, or in the office if suitable stand records exist. Tables have been developed to organize variables which need to be evaluated, give instructions on how to evaluate these variables, and determine the need for cultural treatment. This publication describes in greater detail the variables measured, makes further suggestions on measurement technique, and demonstrates how the tables should be used.
Spot Occurrence
Three variables are used to evaluate spot occurrence.
|
RATING SPOT OCCURRENCE VARIABLES 1) PINE COMPONENT (determined from stand records, ocular estimate, or cruise)
2) SLOPE (use a clinometer, Abney level, ocular estimate, or SCS soil survey)
3) CLAY CONTENT (use a field test, SCS soil survey, or stand records)
|
Determining Spot Occurrence (Risk) - In the following table, find the combination of results from the first three questions which matches your evaluation. Record the corresponding risk value. The higher the risk value, the greater the chance of SPB attack. After determining the risk of spot occurrence, proceed to spot spread.
| Pine Component |
Slope | Clay Content |
(A) Risk Value |
| Yes
Yes No Yes No Yes No No |
Yes
No Yes Yes No No Yes No |
Yes
Yes Yes No Yes No No No |
3
3 3 2 2 1 1 1 |
Spot Spread
Determining Spot Spread (Hazard) - The possibility of an SPB spot spreading is determined by one variable: Pine Basal Area. The probability of an SPB spot increasing in size once it is established is directly related to stand density. Stands in which basal area is over 120 square feet per acre are very susceptible to spot spread. In dense stands, trees grow close together, allowing dispersing beetles to find a new host easily. Pine basal area can be estimated by using a prism, visual estimate, or stand records. In the next table, select the range in which your estimate falls and note the corresponding hazard value (B) .
Spot Spread
| Pine Basal Area | (B) Hazard Value | Hazard Class |
| more
than 120
90-120 less than 90 |
3
2 1 |
High
Moderate Low |
Potential Loss
Determining Potential Loss - Potential loss depends on the risk of a SPB spot becoming established in a stand plus the hazard of the spot spreading. To determine potential loss, simply add the risk value (A) and the hazard value (B).
Determining Potential Loss
| Potential Loss Value | = | (A)
Risk Value |
= | (B) Hazard Value |
| __________ | = | (A) _______ | = | (B) _______ |
Determining Need for Cultural Treatment - The potential loss value is used to determine the need for cultural treatment. The final table describes potential loss values according to their corresponding need for cultural treatment. Cultural treatments should be based on the management objective of the owner. They may include converting shortleaf pine stands to other species, harvesting over-mature stands, and thinning stands which have not reached maturity to promote stand resistance to SPB.
| Potential Loss Value | Need for Treatment |
| 6
5 4 3 2 |
Extremely High
High Moderate Low Extremely Low |
Further Suggestions
When applying this rating system in the field, measurements should be made at several points. Then the risk, hazard, and potential loss calculated for each point should be averaged for the stand. When appropriate stand records exist, rating the stands in the office will yield a good estimate. If possible, ratings should be made when SPB populations are low, so that attention can be given to applying necessary preventive cultural treatments rather than reacting to active infestations.
Additional Information
Keeping your pine timber stands healthy and vigorous, and having a good knowledge of the southern pine beetle habits and symptoms is essential to effectively deal with this destructive pest. Professional advice and assistance is available through the South Carolina Forestry Commission, Clemson University Cooperative Extension Service, U.S.D.A. Forest Service, forest industry personnel, and private consulting foresters. Acknowledgment: USDA Technical Bulletin No. 1612.
C. Karpinski, Former
Forester I
Roy L. Hedden, Professor